MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089346948 · doi:10.1086/375151

Simulations of Galaxy Formation in a ΛCDM Universe. III. The Dissipative Formation of an Elliptical Galaxy

2003· article· en· W2089346948 on OpenAlexaff
Andrés Meza, Julio F. Navarro, Matthias Steinmetz, V. R. Eke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsElliptical galaxyLenticular galaxyGalaxyGalaxy mergerSurface brightness fluctuationSatellite galaxyInteracting galaxyGalaxy formation and evolutionAstronomyAccretion (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine the dynamical structure of an elliptical galaxy simulated in the ΛCDM scenario. The morphology of the galaxy evolves dramatically over time in response to the mode and timing of mass accretion; smooth deposition of cooled gas leads to the formation of centrifugally supported disks, while major mergers disperse stellar disks into spheroids. In the case we consider here, these two modes of accretion alternate successively until z ~ 0.6, when the galaxy undergoes one last major (1 : 3) merger. The event triggers a starburst that consumes much of the remaining gas into stars. Little gas cools and accretes subsequently, and as a result, most stars at z = 0 are rather old (75% are older than 9 Gyr) and distributed in a spheroidal component that resembles present-day elliptical galaxies. Dynamically, the galaxy is well approximated by an E4 oblate rotator, with rotational support increasing steadily from the center outward. The apparent rotation support, as measured by V rot /σ, correlates strongly with isophotal deviations from perfect ellipses. Boxy isophotes are obtained when the galaxy is seen face-on and V rot /σ ≪ 1. On the other hand, disky isophotes are found for inclinations that maximize V rot /σ. The line-of-sight velocity distribution is nearly Gaussian at all radii, although small but significant deviations are robustly measured. The sign of the Gauss-Hermite skewness parameter h 3 is anticorrelated with the apparent sense of rotation, in agreement with observed trends. Despite its relatively recent assembly, the simulated galaxy has much higher effective surface brightness than normal elliptical galaxies of similar luminosity, in a way reminiscent of the less common type of M32-like "compact elliptical galaxies." This is likely a direct consequence of our star formation and feedback algorithm, which allows for efficient transformation of gas into stars in dense, early collapsing progenitors rather than a definitive prediction for the structure of galaxies assembled in this ΛCDM halo. Despite this limitation, our simulation suggests that dark matter plays a minor role in the luminous regions of compact elliptical galaxies, whose dynamical mass-to-light ratios are thus not dissimilar to those of normal elliptical galaxies. This explains the proximity of compact elliptical galaxies to edge-on projections of the fundamental plane, despite their far greater velocity dispersion at given luminosity. Overall, our simulation shows that repeated episodes of dissipational collapse, followed by merger events, lead to stellar spheroids that are only mildly triaxial and of relatively simple kinematic structure. This is in better agreement with observation than earlier models based on dissipationless mergers of stellar disks and a positive step toward reconciling the observed structure of elliptical galaxies with a hierarchical assembly process where mergers play a substantial role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations113
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207