MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089365578 · doi:10.1002/sim.3295

The power of testing a semi‐parametric shared gamma frailty parameter in failure time data

2008· article· en· W2089365578 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Rahgozar, Soghrat Faghihzadeh, Gholamreza Babaee Rouchi, Yingwei Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics in Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorNonparametric statisticsStatisticsParametric statisticsMathematicsHazardPower (physics)Parametric modelFunction (biology)EconometricsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frailty is usually modeled as an unobserved random variable acting multiplicatively on the baseline hazard function, where a shared unobserved quantity in the intensity induces a positive correlation among the observed failure times. Using the asymptotic properties of the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the gamma frailty model, we derive a power function for testing the shared frailty parameter and evaluate the effect of number of groups and number of individuals per groups on the power of the test by simulation studies. The results show that choosing between 8 and 25 groups with sample sizes between 200 and 500 individuals will be enough to get a high power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics in MedicineSame topicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207