MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089391282 · doi:10.1121/1.3384874

Travel time inversion of broadband data from Shallow Water 2006 experiments.

2010· article· en· W2089391282 on OpenAlexaff
Yong‐Min Jiang, N. Ross Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaves and shallow waterBroadbandGeologyInversion (geology)Water columnAcousticsSeabedGeodesySeismologyOceanographyTelecommunicationsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents geoacoustic inversions of broadband signals collected by the L-shaped array SWAMI32 during the Shallow Water 2006 Experiments. The L-shaped array was deployed in 70 m of water off the coast of New Jersey. The vertical leg of the array (VLA) has 10 even spaced sensors which expends 53.55 m in the water column, while the horizontal leg (HLA) has 20 uneven spaced bottom moored sensors that give 256.43 m of the aperture. An acoustic source was maintained at a depth of 35 m and towed along a circle around the VLA at a speed of 0.5 knots. The distance between the acoustic source and the VLA was around 190 m. Mid-frequency (1100–2900-Hz) chirps received at the VLA and HLA were analyzed for investigating the variability of the sea bottom properties around the circle. The data at the HLA were analyzed to assist the identification of the bottom layer structure while the data at VLA were employed to carry out the geoacoustic inversion. Environmental data collected in the vicinity were used in the inversion to account for the variable water column environment. [Work supported by ONR Ocean Acoustics.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207