MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electrical and photoelectric properties of polycrystalline diamond films deposited from an abnormal glow discharge

2014· article· en· W2089392763 on OpenAlexaff
Ф. В. Конусов, А. В. Кабышев, Stepan Linnik, A. Gaydaychuk, Г. Е. Ремнев

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoconductivityMaterials sciencePhotoelectric effectDiamondFermi levelBand gapActivation energyElectrical resistivity and conductivityCharge carrierTrappingCrystalliteCondensed matter physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsChemistryElectronElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical and photovoltaic properties of polycrystalline diamond films (PDF), deposited from the abnormal glow discharge were analysed. Features of charge carrier transfer in PDF are determined by continuous energy distribution in the band gap of defect states of different nature. Dominated n-type conductivity activation component of electrical conduction and photoconductivity is complemented by a hopping mechanism with the participation of states near the Fermi level with a density 5.6·1017–2.1·1021 eV−1 cm−3. Activation transfer is realized in the exchange of charge carriers between the allowed bands and donor levels with the activation energy 0.007-0.21 eV, which are sparsely populated and have wide variation in their parameters. Trapping centers and carriers recombination are heterogeneously distributed in grain boundaries. Under lighting, the state density increases 3-5 times and probable jump length decreases by 1-3 nm. Spectral distribution centers of photosensitivity are correlated with the distribution of deep-level defects, determining the absorption spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207