MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089412871 · doi:10.1353/can.2005.0070

A Brief History of Gay: Canada's First Gay Tabloid, 1964-1966 (review)

2005· article· en· W2089412871 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ross Higgins

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesbianHonourJournalismHistoryMedia studiesSociologyGender studiesLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A Brief History of GAY: Canada's First Gay Tabloid, 1964-1966 Ross Higgins A Brief History of GAY: Canada's First Gay Tabloid, 1964-1966. Donald W. McLeod. Toronto: Homewood Books, 2003. Pp. 96, illus. $15.00 For a few exhilarating months in the mid-1960s, a Toronto magazine bearing the unambiguous title GAY was sending 20,000 copies to the United States for national distribution. Few gay magazines were published anywhere in the world in the years of secrecy before the emergence of the open gay community of today. The startling story of this publication has long mystified researchers in lesbian and gay history who will thus welcome Don McLeod's latest contribution. Though McLeod is the first to point out that this is only a 'brief history,' lacking in biographical details on the small group of courageous men who founded the magazine, this volume outlines their struggle to inform and entertain members of Toronto's clandestine gay world and later to expand into the American market. Only fifteen issues appeared between 1964 and 1966, but this scant output guarantees GAY a place of honour in the history of gay journalism in North America. For a short time, this pioneering little publication outsold all the other gay publications then available combined. Supplementing the excellent archival sources with an interview with the only man he could find from the group of magazine collaborators, McLeod documents the checkered history of the publication from its start in March 1964. After a few issues, the first president absconded with most of the cash in the bank account. The other founders, together with contributors who had joined the effort during the first few months, managed to find a new investor and miraculously saved the magazine. Despite his success in breaking into the American market, the investor caused its final closure when he was arrested in early 1966. McLeod provides an issue-by-issue summary of the contents. One day we hope to see the full print run on a website, since it documents gay life in Toronto in a period about which little is known. Though much of the content consists of bitchy gossip, graphics of poor quality and reprinted articles, GAY also provided its readers with serious commentaries on political, ethical, and even historical themes related to homosexuality. Along with the 'Diary of a Call Boy' series, there was a discussion of homosexuality in ancient Greece and criticism of the treatment of homosexuals by the police and the media. There were also listings of gay groups internationally and comments on the activities of the fledgling homophile movement in the United States. Such views had not previously been accessible. What this book lacks is a perspective on why we should care about all this. What makes this magazine significant? McLeod's theoretical apparatus [End Page 146] consists largely of a notion of the magazine finding its 'voice,' unable to decide whether to liberate gay sexuality through a weird combination of camp humour and political analysis, or to reject those elements, as some readers urged, that detracted from gay respectability and assimilation into mainstream culture. In my view, what made GAY significant is implicit throughout this book, though the author doesn't point it out: this magazine was a business venture aimed at a gay readership. In its pages, other gay-oriented businesses advertised or were discussed, including bars, physique studios, and dating services. At the same time it included significant discussion of the emerging rhetoric of gay identity and the defence of individuals' right to live free from arbitrary arrest and censorship. The parallel opening of these commercial and discursive spaces, each contributing to the development of the other over the course of the 1960s, paved the way for the open gay communities that sprang to life (and to public awareness) after 1969. The fact that GAY was a commercial failure and that it had already been forgotten just a few years after its closure when gay liberation came to Canada should not obscure the vital role it played in showing that gay businesses could succeed and that they could help open a forum for the development of gay political ideology...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ IssuesFrench-language works237,207