MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089419922 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.20172

Modifier effects in autism at the MAO‐A and DBH loci

2004· article· en· W2089419922 on OpenAlexaff
Marshall B. Jones, Roberta M. Palmour, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Péter Szatmári

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocus (genetics)AlleleAutismGeneticsGenotypePsychologyGeneDevelopmental psychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autism is one of a group of pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) characterized by qualitative impairments in reciprocal social communication and by a preference for repetitive, stereotyped activities, interests, and behaviors. The disorder is caused in large part by genetic mechanisms, though no disease genes have yet been identified. The objective of this study was to investigate three markers, two in the DBH gene and one in the MAO-A gene, for maternal or fetal modifier effects on level of functioning (IQ). At the same time, the possibility of maternal or fetal susceptibility effects was also examined. We assembled 67 affected sibpairs and 45 singletons and determined allele frequencies at the three markers among the affected children and first degree relatives. Sizeable and significant modifier effects were found at the MAO locus and, to a lesser extent, at the DBH locus. Susceptibility effects were also found but not without qualification. We conclude that maternal genotypes at the MAO-A locus, and possibly at the DBH one, may modify IQ in children with autism through the intrauterine environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric GeneticsSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207