MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Implementing Sparse Matrix Ordering Using Hypergraph Partitioning

2013· article· en· W2089448319 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lu Yao, Yi Yang, Zheng Hua Wang, Wei Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
KeywordsHypergraphCholesky decompositionSparse matrixComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Vertex (graph theory)Matrix (chemical analysis)AlgorithmHeuristicTheoretical computer scienceCombinatoricsMathematicsMathematical optimizationGraphEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMaterials scienceComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matrix ordering is a key technique when applying Cholesky factorization method to solving sparse symmetric positive definite system Ax = b. Much effort has been devoted to the development of powerful heuristic ordering algorithms. This paper implements a sparse matrix ordering scheme based on hypergraph partitioning. The novel nested dissection ordering scheme achieve the vertex separator by hypergraph partitioning. Experimental results show that the novel scheme produces results that are substantially better than METIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207