MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089464900 · doi:10.1097/rli.0b013e3181e1939d

Intravascular Functional Maps of Common Neurovascular Lesions Derived From Volumetric 4D CT Data

2010· article· en· W2089464900 on OpenAlexaff
Joe Barfett, Jorn Fierstra, Peter W. A. Willems, David J. Mikulis, Timo Krings

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Radiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoxelSegmentationAngiographyBolus (digestion)ScannerBlood flowBiomedical engineeringMedicineNuclear medicineRadiologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Current computed tomography angiography (CTA) postprocessing tools do not support quantitative assessment of intravascular physiology. Dynamic volumetric CT, acquired at a sufficiently high temporal resolution, is ideal for such analysis. Following preliminary experiments in flow phantoms, we examine the segmentation of blood vessels from 4D CT angiography by curve fit and encoding of functional blood flow information into the resulting functional intravascular maps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flow phantoms were constructed consisting of a single pipe input and 4 simultaneous outputs of varying flow rates. Two outflow pipe diameters were tested. Bolus transit time (TT), time to peak (TTP), and time of arrival (TOA) were analyzed using contrast bolus profiles generated from 4D volumetric CT examinations on a 320 detector scanner in regions of interest placed 10 cm apart in all outflow pipes. Six subjects with various neurovascular lesions were next examined using a volumetric contrast-enhanced 4D CT angiography protocol. Segmentation was performed by quadratic curve fit after comparative analysis and optimization of the segmentation technique using quadratic curves, the gamma variate function, and a simplified formulation of the gamma variate function. After segmentation, quantitative analysis of spatially congruent intravascular voxels including TTP, rise, TT, and slope of the contrast upstroke was employed to encode physiologic information into the segmentations and produce intravascular functional maps. Comparison was made in each case to the patient's routine imaging. RESULTS: Increasing volumetric flow rates correspond to reduction of bolus TT in flow phantoms. TT elongation was observed as the contrast bolus moved distally in all pipes, with greater elongation seen at slower flow rates and larger pipe diameters. A greater difference was observed between TTP proximally and distally in pipes compared with TOA, an effect most prominent at slower flow rates and larger pipe lumens, and thus TTP was chosen for functional encoding into segmentations of the clinical series. In vivo, the quadratic function demonstrated the lowest coefficient of variation when fit to intravascular time density series and outperformed 2 formulations of the gamma variate function. After segmentation with quadratic curves, Gaussian distributions were chosen over gamma variate functions to characterize contrast bolus profiles while neglecting recirculation and to calculate functional parameters for spatial encoding. Intravascular functional maps free of bone artifacts were created in every case that demonstrated all appropriate vessels and showed agreement with conventional imaging modalities in terms of vessel delineation and the diagnosis of vascular pathology. The most useful and interesting functional maps are discussed in each case. CONCLUSIONS: The above approach to quantitative CT angiography provides a method of evaluating dynamic CTA data by means of intravascular functional maps. The techniques are broadly applicable in the clinical assessment of a variety of vascular diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative RadiologySame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207