Tissue reaction and biodegradation of implanted cross‐linked high amylose starch in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The biocompatibility and degradation characteristics of cross-linked high amylose starch (Contramid were investigated in rats over 4 months. Contramid pellets (3-mm diameter and thickness) obtained by direct compression, were implanted subcutaneously and intramuscularly. On sequential time points, macroscopic observations of implantation sites were performed and tissue samples were removed, fixed, and histologically evaluated. No macroscopic inflammatory reaction was observed with Contramid.. Upon histologic examination, inflammatory reaction produced by Contramid was moderate and restricted to implantation sites. The sequence of inflammatory events with Contramid was similar regardless of implantation site. Degradation of Contramid pellets was characterized by fragmentation with formation of fibrovascular septa and phagocytosis by macrophages. Finally Contramid was mostly absorbed by the end of the 4-month period and substituted by adipocytes. It has been demonstrated that Contramid is a biocompatible and absorbable material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".