MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089488870 · doi:10.1074/jbc.c300202200

Split dnaE Genes Encoding Multiple Novel Inteins in Trichodesmium erythraeum

2003· article· en· W2089488870 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang‐Qin Liu, Jing Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneBiologyGeneticsTrichodesmiumEncoding (memory)Computational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three inteins were found when analyzing a pair of split dnaE genes encoding the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase III in the oceanic N2-fixing cyanobacterium Trichodesmium erythraeum. The three inteins (DnaE-1, DnaE-2, and DnaE-3) were clustered in a 70-amino acid (aa) region of the predicted DnaE protein. The DnaE-1 intein is 1258 aa long and three times as large as a typical intein, due to the presence of large tandem repeats in which a 57-aa sequence is repeated 17 times. The DnaE-2 intein has a more typical size of 428 aa with putative protein splicing and endonuclease domains. The DnaE-3 intein is a split intein consisting of a 102-aa N-terminal part and a 36-aa C-terminal part encoded on the first and second split dnaE genes, respectively. Synthesis of a mature DnaE protein is predicted to involve expression of two split dnaE genes followed by two protein cis-splicing reactions and one protein trans-splicing reaction. Tandem repeats in the DnaE-1 intein inhibited the protein splicing activity of this intein when tested in Escherichia coli cells and may potentially regulate DnaE synthesis in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207