MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Raman Spectra of a 4H-SiC Epitaxial Layer on Porous and Non-Porous 4H-SiC Substrates

2007· article· en· W2089489731 on OpenAlexaff
M. J. Clouter, Yue Ke, Robert P. Devaty, W. J. Choyke, Y. Shishkin, Stephen E. Saddow

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersUniversity of South FloridaUniversity of Pittsburgh
KeywordsMaterials scienceRaman spectroscopyEpitaxyLayer (electronics)Substrate (aquarium)Raman scatteringPorosityEtching (microfabrication)Spectral lineDopingPorous mediumPhononOptoelectronicsComposite materialOpticsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A lightly doped n-type homo-epitaxial layer was grown by CVD onto a heavily doped n-type 4H-SiC substrate for which half of the surface had been made porous by photoelectrochemical etching. Raman spectra are obtained in the optic phonon region using three scattering geometries. An effective medium model for the porous layer is used to assist in the interpretation of the spectra. This work demonstrates that the contributions to the Raman spectra of the various layers in a sample with multiple 4H-SiC layers can be extracted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207