MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089491841 · doi:10.1093/tandt/11.10.33

Gender Recognition Act: all change

2005· article· en· W2089491841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrusts & Trustees · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiscrimination and Equality Law
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare (algebra)Library scienceLawPolitical scienceComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gender Recognition Act: all change Get access Jo Goldby, Jo Goldby Private Client DepartmentHoward Kennedy, 19 Cavendish Square, London, W1A 2AW, Tel: +44 207 663 8630, Fax: +44 207 663 8730 E-mail: J.Goldby@howardkennedy.com, www.howardkennedy.com Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Charlie Klendjian Charlie Klendjian Private Client DepartmentHoward Kennedy, 19 Cavendish Square, London, W1A 2AW, Tel: +44 207 663 8630, Fax: +44 207 663 8730 E-mail: J.Goldby@howardkennedy.com, www.howardkennedy.com Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Trusts & Trustees, Volume 11, Issue 10, October 2005, Pages 33–35, https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/11.10.33 Published: 01 October 2005

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it