Force Evolution Model for Vortex-Induced Vibration of an Elastic Cylinder in a Cross Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vortex-induced vibration of a single circular cylinder is a fundamental and significant case of flow-induced vibrations in both engineering practice and academic research. A force evolution model is developed for vortex-induced vibration of an elastic cylinder in a cross flow. In this model, the elastic cylinder is represented by the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, and the vortex-induced force acting on the stationary cylinder is modeled by a bounded-noise process. Fluid-structure interaction is represented by an evolution process based on the concept of quasi-steady flow. A numerical iterative approach is used to simulate the evolution process and obtain time histories of cylinder vibration and vortex-induced force. The model is validated against available measurements. It is shown that the proposed model can reproduce the salient features observed in experiments. Furthermore, quantitative agreement with experimental measurements is obtained in general. However, when the vibration amplitude is very large due to intense fluid-structure interaction, the proposed model prediction is not quite satisfactory. This suggests that the concept of quasi-steady flow is only applicable for relatively weak fluid-structure interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".