Spatial Deformation Measurement Using Transparent Soil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper addresses the need for nonintrusively measuring spatial deformation pattern inside soils. In this study, transparent soil surrogates are used in model tests instead of natural soils. Transparent soil with macrogeotechnical properties similar to those of natural soils was made of either transparent amorphous silica gels or powders and a pore fluid with a matching refractive index. An optical system consisting of a laser light, a line-generator lens, a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, a frame grabber, and a computer was developed to optically slice a transparent soil model. A distinctive speckle pattern is generated by the interaction of the laser light and transparent soil. The laser speckle images before and after deformation were used to nonintrusively measure the relative displacement field using digital image cross-correlation. Spatial displacement fields under a model footing were obtained by combining several cross-sections in MATLAB®. Test results showed that the developed optical system and transparent soil are suitable for studying soil-structural interaction problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it