Aminoglycoside suppression of nonsense mutations in severe hemophilia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aminoglycoside antibiotics exhibit their bactericidal effect by interfering with normal ribosomal activity. In this pilot study, we have evaluated the effect of the aminoglycoside antibiotic gentamicin on the factor VIII (FVIII) and IX levels of severe hemophiliacs with known nonsense mutations. Five patients were enrolled and each patient was given 3 consecutive days of gentamicin at a dose of 7 mg/kg intravenously every 24 hours. Two patients (patient no. 1: hemophilia A, Ser1395Stop; and patient no. 5: hemophilia B, Arg333Stop) showed a decrease in their activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), an increase in their FVIII (0.016 IU/mL, 1.6%) or FIX (0.02 IU/mL, 2%) levels, and an increase in thrombin generation. The remaining 3 patients (patient no. 2: hemophilia B, Arg252Stop; patient no. 3: hemophilia A, Arg2116Stop; and patient no. 4: hemophilia A, Arg427Stop) showed no response in the aPTTs or factor levels, but one (patient no. 2: hemophilia B, Arg252Stop) showed an increase in the factor IX antigen level (2%-5.5%) that persisted throughout the period of the study and was concordant with an increase in thrombin generation. Gentamicin is unlikely to be an effective treatment for severe hemophilia due to its potential toxicities and the minimal response documented in this report. This study, however, does provide a proof of principle, suggesting that ribosomal interference with a less toxic agent may be a potential therapeutic mechanism for severe hemophilia patients with nonsense mutations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".