MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089546763 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2012.09.013

Numerical Investigation of Flowfield in PEM Fuel Cell Stack Headers

2012· article· en· W2089546763 on OpenAlexaff
Boris Chernyavsky, K. Ravi, Pang‐Chieh Sui, Ned Djilali, Pierre Bénard

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStack (abstract data type)Proton exchange membrane fuel cellNuclear engineeringFuel cellsAerospace engineeringComputational fluid dynamicsComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceOperating systemChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study addresses the factor often overlooked in analysis of fuel cell stack performance, namely the influence of the disturbances in the flowfields in the stack inflow and outflow headers. The flowfield in the header, formed by a superposition of numerous secondary in/outflows, has a complex and fundamentally unsteady nature, which has been shown by previous studies to result in non-uniform flow distribution of flow parameters along the header length. These non-uniformities can have significant effect on the components flow rates through the individual fuel cells in the stack, resulting in a differences in operating condition between individual cells, potentially compromising overall stack performance. Present work uses numerical simulation approach to model flowfield in the inflow and outflow headers. The objective of the present work is to investigate the effects of flow disturbances in the headers on stack performance. Flow rate differences between individual cells and the extent of transient variation in the flow rates through individual cells due to disturbances in the headers are investigated. Both inflow and outflow headers are modeled as a complete system, simulating the entire feedback loop between them, allowing direct modeling of transient variations of flow rate through the individual cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207