The induction of inorganic carbon transport and external carbonic anhydrase in <i>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii</i> is regulated by external CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Induction of the carbon concentrating mechanism (CCM) has been investigated during the acclimation of 5% CO2‐grown Chlamydomonas reinhardtii 2137 mt + cells to well‐defined dissolved inorganic carbon (Ci) limited conditions. The CCM components investigated were active HCO3− transport, active CO2 transport and extracellular carbonic anhydrase (CAext) activity. The CAext activity increased 10‐fold within 6 h of acclimation to 0·035% CO2 and there was a further slight increase over the next 18 h. The CAext activity also increased substantially after an 8 h lag period during acclimation to air in darkness. Active CO2 and HCO3− uptake by C. reinhardtii cells were induced within 2 h of acclimation to air, but active CO2 transport was induced prior to active HCO3− transport. Similar results were obtained during acclimation to air in darkness. The critical Ci concentrations effecting the induction of active Ci transport and CAext activity were determined by allowing cells to acclimate to various inflow CO2 concentrations in the range 0·035–0·84% at constant pH. The total Ci concentration eliciting the induction and repression of active Ci transport was higher during acclimation at pH 7·5 than at pH 5·5, but the external CO2 concentration was the same at both pHs of acclimation. The concentration of external CO2 required for the full induction and repression of Ci transport and CAext activity were 10 and 100 μM, respectively. The induction of CAext and active Ci transport are not correlated temporally, but are regulated by the same critical CO2 concentration in the medium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".