MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089625361 · doi:10.1021/cm0507563

Photoconductivity in Donor−Acceptor Polyferrocenylsilane−Fullerene Composite Films

2005· article· en· W2089625361 on OpenAlex
Paul W. Cyr, Ethan J. D. Klem, Edward H. Sargent, Ian Manners

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFullerene Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFullereneBuckminsterfullerenePhotoconductivityMaterials scienceElectron acceptorOpen-circuit voltageAcceptorThin filmOptoelectronicsPhotochemistryElectron donorNanotechnologyVoltageChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organometallic polymer-based solid-state photoconductive and photovoltaic devices using thin films of blends of poly(ferrocenylmethylphenylsilane) (PFMPS) and fullerenes as the active layers were fabricated. Buckminsterfullerene C 60 and [6,6]-phenyl C 61 butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) fullerene derivative were investigated as electron acceptors in the devices, in the range of 5−18 mol % relative to the ferrocenyl electron donor in PFMPS. The devices show a predominantly UV spectral response. The short circuit currents were on the order of nanoamperes under white light illumination of ca. 160 mW/cm 2, and the open circuit voltage was found to vary from ca. 0.3 V for devices with C 60 to ca. 0.45 V for devices with PCBM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it