Randomized, Multicenter Trial of a Single Dose of AS03-adjuvanted or Unadjuvanted H1N1 2009 Pandemic Influenza Vaccine in Children 6 Months to <9 Years of Age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the 2009-2010 influenza pandemic, we evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of different H1N1 2009 pandemic influenza vaccines delivering various viral hemagglutinin (HA) doses with or without AS03 (a tocopherol oil-in-water emulsion-based adjuvant system) in children (NCT00976820). METHODS: Three hundred twenty-two healthy children 6 months to <9 years of age were randomized to receive 2 doses of nonadjuvanted (15 µg or 7.5 µg HA) or adjuvanted vaccine (3.75 µg HA/AS03A or 1.9 µg HA/AS03B), 21 days apart. Blood samples before and after each dose were tested for immune responses using hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays. Safety assessments were done up to day 385. RESULTS: The first dose of both AS03-adjuvanted vaccines elicited strong immune responses (seroprotection rates: 98.3%/99.0%; seroconversion rates: 94.9%/97.0%; geometric mean fold rises: 36.2/33.6), which were higher post-dose 2 (seroprotection rate: 100.0%/100%; seroconversion rate: 100.0%/98.8%; geometric mean fold rise: 157.1/151.6), meeting European regulatory criteria on days 21 and 42. The nonadjuvanted 15 µg HA vaccine also met the regulatory criteria after each dose; the 7.5 µg HA vaccine met them only post-dose 2. Six months post-dose 1, all vaccines except the nonadjuvanted 7.5 µg HA vaccine met European regulatory criteria. Neutralizing antibody response paralleled the hemagglutination inhibition immune response after each dose. Pain at the injection site, lasting 2-3 days, was more common following adjuvanted than nonadjuvanted vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: AS03-adjuvanted H1N1 2009 pandemic influenza vaccine (3.75 µg or 1.9 µg HA), administered as 2 doses, was highly immunogenic, induced long-term immune response to 6 months, with a clinically acceptable safety profile in children aged 6 months to <9 years of age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".