MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2089675646 · doi:10.1139/w02-102

Expression of a glycogen synthase protein kinase homolog from <i>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</i> f.sp. <i>malvae</i> during infection of <i>Malva pusilla</i>

2002· article· en· W2089675646 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Paul H. Goodwin, Grace Y.-J Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyColletotrichum gloeosporioidesMicrobiologyGene expressionGSK-3Fungal pathogenPathogenColletotrichumHost (biology)Gene knockdownKinaseFungal growthProtein kinase APenetration (warfare)GeneBotanyCell biologyBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential role of a GSK3 protein kinase homolog, cggsk, was examined from Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f.sp. malvae, a fungal pathogen of Malva pusilla. A peak in cggsk expression relative to a constitutively expressed fungal actin gene occurred during host penetration and was followed by much lower expression levels during subsequent biotrophic and necrotrophic growth in host tissue. The peak level of cggsk expression observed during penetration was 21-fold greater than that during necrotrophic growth. Expression of cggsk showed small but reproducible changes during growth in culture; however, the levels were always similar to that during necrotrophic growth in the host. One possible role for cggsk could be to coordinate fungal development during host penetration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→