MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089727050 · doi:10.1055/s-2006-948554

Integrins in the Ovary

2006· review· en· W2089727050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Reproductive Medicine · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChristie (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegrinCell biologyDisintegrinExtracellular matrixBiologyFollicular atresiaCell adhesionReceptorOvarian follicleOvaryMatrix metalloproteinaseCellEndocrinologyMetalloproteinaseBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrins are the major receptors mediating adhesion to the extracellular matrix. Following ligand binding, conformational changes of integrins induce the recruitment of multiple signaling and scaffolding proteins that connect integrin tails to the actin cytoskeleton and permit activation of signaling pathways regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and migration. In the ovary, extracellular matrix components present in the follicular basement membrane, around follicular cells, and in the follicular fluid participate in the regulation of follicular development, and a role of integrins in this process is strongly suggested. We discuss available data on integrin expression in ovary, integrin function in granulosa cells, and the possible involvement of integrins in follicular growth, atresia, and luteinization. We also discuss the potential role of oocyte integrins as receptors for sperm ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) in fertilization and the cooperation of integrins with proteinases in regulating proliferation, adhesion, migration, and invasion of ovarian surface epithelium cells in ovarian tumor development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it