Intrathecal Lidocaine Prevents Cardiovascular Collapse and Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema in a Rat Model of Acute Intracranial Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Sympathetic hyperactivity during sudden intracranial hypertension leads to cardiovascular instability, myocardial dysfunction, and neurogenic pulmonary edema. Because spinal anesthesia is associated with sympatholysis, we investigated the protective effects of intrathecal lidocaine in a rodent model. Halothane-anesthetized rats were given a 10-microL intrathecal injection of saline (n = 10) or lidocaine 1% (n = 6). A subdural balloon catheter was inflated for 60 s to produce intracranial hypertension. Hemodynamics were monitored, and hearts and lungs were harvested for histological examination. In Saline versus Lidocaine-Treated rats, peak mean arterial blood pressure during balloon inflation was 115 +/- 4 mm Hg versus 78 +/- 8 mm Hg (P < 0.05), mean arterial blood pressure 30 min after balloon deflation was 47 +/- 2 mm Hg versus 67 +/- 3 mm Hg (P < 0.05), and lung weight was 1.54 +/- 0.03 g versus 1.41 +/- 0.04 g (P < 0.05), respectively. Cardiac dysrhythmias and electrocardiographic changes were more frequent in the Saline-Treated group (P < 0.05). Saline-Treated rats had extensive, hemorrhagic pulmonary edema, whereas the Lidocaine-Treated rats had only patchy areas of lung abnormality. Histological changes in the myocardium were rare, and no difference was found between the two groups. We conclude that intrathecal lidocaine prevents cardiovascular collapse and neurogenic pulmonary edema in a rat model of acute intracranial hypertension. IMPLICATIONS: In a rat model of intracranial balloon inflation, intrathecal lidocaine prevented cardiovascular collapse and neurogenic pulmonary edema. Descending neural pathways are involved in the development of cardiopulmonary complications associated with acute intracranial hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".