Viscous dissipation effect on mixed convection flow of a micropolar fluid over an exponentially stretching sheet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micropolar boundary-layer flow and heat transfer characteristics associated with a heated exponential stretching continuous sheet being cooled by a mixed convection flow are examined. The relevant heat transfer mechanisms are of interest in a wide variety of practical applications such as hot rolling, continuous casting, extrusion, and drawing. The wall temperature and stretching velocity are assumed to vary according to specific exponential forms. The contributions of buoyancy along with viscous dissipation on the convective transport in the boundary-layer region is analyzed in the opposing and assisting flow situations. Local similarity solutions are obtained for the boundary-layer equations governing the problem. A parametric study of the mixed convection parameter ξ, the micropolar parameter Δ, the Eckert number Ec, the parameter of temperature distribution n, and Prandtl number Pr is conducted and a representative set of numerical results for the velocity, angular velocity, temperature profiles, local skin friction coefficient, wall couple stress parameter, and local Nusselt number are illustrated graphically to show typical trends of the solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".