Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 1. Development and Validation of FITTED 1.0
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the development and validation of a novel suite of programs, FITTED 1.0, for the docking of flexible ligands into flexible proteins. This docking tool is unique in that it can deal with both the flexibility of macromolecules (side chains and main chains) and the presence of bridging water molecules while treating protein/ligand complexes as realistically dynamic systems. This software relies on a genetic algorithm to account for the flexibility of the two molecules as well as the location of bridging water molecules. In addition, FITTED 1.0 features a novel application of a switching function to retain or displace key water molecules from the protein-ligand complexes. Two independent modules, ProCESS and SMART, were developed to set up the proteins and the ligands prior to the docking stage. Validation of the accuracy of the software was achieved via the application of FITTED 1.0 to the docking of inhibitors of HIV-1 protease, thymidine kinase, trypsin, factor Xa, and MMP to their respective proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".