MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089909744 · doi:10.1080/j003v16n02_07

Iatrogenesis Within Long Term Care Facilities

2002· article· en· W2089909744 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational Therapy In Health Care · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmLong-term careMedicineOccupational therapyActivities of daily livingHealth careGerontologyAssisted livingTerm (time)NursingPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seniors living within long term care facilities have higher incidences of frailness, chronic disease, and deterioration as compared with seniors living in the community. There is increasing evidence within the literature that some of this deterioration is caused by the very facilities they are living in. This article discusses the iatrogenic factors associated with living in long term care facilities and the consequences of such factors on older adults. Following this, an exploration of the relevancy of this issue for occupational therapists will take place. Occupational therapists must be particularly alert to the dangers of iatrogenic effects and be concerned with making changes within the long term care system to prevent further harm to older adults and work on promoting an environment that promotes optimal health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccupational Therapy In Health CareSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207