Bibliographic record
Abstract
À travers une recension des recherches récentes, l'article fait le point sur la question des transferts en écriture de la langue maternelle à la langue seconde. Les connaissances orthographiques et lexicales, le traite-ment grammatical et syntaxique, les stratégies générales et les schémas culturels de la L1 influencent l'écriture en L2, mais la conscience du niveau de langue approprié est plus difficilement transférable. La compétence linguisti-que en L2 affecte la qualité du produit, non celle du processus, mais un seuil minimal de cette compétence est nécessaire au transfert des stratégies de haut niveau. Les effets positifs du transfert se manifestent davantage dans le processus que dans le produit, où ils dépendent de la proximité relative des langues. Les limites des recherches actuelles sont identifiées et des pistes de recherches futures sont suggérées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".