A point mutation in the groove of HLA-DO allows egress from the endoplasmic reticulum independent of HLA-DM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
B lymphocytes express the nonclassical class II molecule HLA-DO, which modulates the peptide loading activity of HLA-DM in the endocytic pathway. Binding to HLA-DM is required for HLA-DO to egress from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). To gain insights into the mode of action of DO and on the role of DM in ER release, we sought to identify DM-binding residues on DO. Our results show that DOalpha encompasses the binding site for HLA-DM. More specifically, mutation of residue DOalpha41 on an exposed lateral loop of the alpha1 domain affects the binding to DM, ER egress, and activity of DO. Using a series of chimeric DR/DO molecules, we confirmed the role of the alpha chain and established that a second DM-binding region is located C-terminal to the DOalpha80 residue, most probably in the alpha2 domain. Interestingly, after mutation of a buried proline (alpha11) on the floor of the putative peptide-binding groove, HLA-DO remained functional but became independent of HLA-DM for ER egress and intracellular trafficking. Collectively, these results suggest that the binding of HLA-DM to DOalpha allows the complex to egress from the ER by stabilizing intramolecular contacts between the N-terminal antiparallel beta-strands of the DOalphabeta heterodimer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".