Neutron scattering and thermal studies of the Ni-incorporated<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CeSbNi</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neutron scattering, thermal expansion, and magnetostriction measurements have been carried out on the cubic compounds ${\mathrm{CeSbNi}}_{x}$ $(x=0--0.4).$ Inelastic neutron scattering studies show a well-defined crystal field (CF) excitation at 4.06 (\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.04) meV and 5.02(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05) meV in $x=0.08$ and 0.15, respectively. The crystal field splitting increases with x compared with the parent compound CeSb (3.19 meV) in spite of the lattice parameter increasing with Ni incorporation. The implication is that the increase in the CF splitting in $x=0.08$ and 0.15 is due to a collapse of the p-f mixing between the Sb $5p$ holes and the localized Ce $4f$ electrons. The analysis of inelastic spectra of $x=0.15$ shows that the ground state is a doublet $({\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7}),$ which explains the temperature-dependent behavior of the magnetic susceptibility. Thermal expansion shows a dramatic change in behavior with Ni composition. The thermal expansion coefficient exhibits a first-order transition at 15.4 K in CeSb, which disappears for Ni composition as low as $x=0.035,$ as well as in an applied field of 8 T. A large magnetostriction has been observed in CeSb in the magnetic-ordered state as well as in the paramagnetic state. The absolute values of the magnetostriction are reduced considerably in the Ni-incorporated alloys. The volume magnetostriction of $x=0.15$ alloy exhibits a scaling behavior in the paramagnetic state from which we have estimated the product of the magnetovolume coupling constant and the isothermal compressibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".