MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090037534 · doi:10.1175/jtech-d-13-00172.1

Reduced-Rank Sigma-Point Kalman Filter and Its Application in ENSO Model

2014· article· en· W2090037534 on OpenAlexaff
K. K. Manoj, Youmin Tang, Ziwang Deng, Dake Chen, Yanjie Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterSingular value decompositionCovarianceRank (graph theory)SigmaCovariance matrixMathematicsEnsemble Kalman filterExtended Kalman filterFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceAlgorithmData assimilationControl theory (sociology)StatisticsPhysicsMeteorologyArtificial intelligenceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The huge computational expense has been a main challenge while applying the sigma-point unscented Kalman filter (SPUKF) to a high-dimensional system. This study focuses on this issue and presents two methods to construct a reduced-rank sigma-point unscented Kalman filter (RRSPUKF). Both techniques employ the truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) to factorize the covariance matrix and reduce its rank through truncation. The reduced-rank square root matrix is used to select the most important sigma points that can retain the main statistical features of the original sigma points. In the first technique, TSVD is applied on the covariance matrix constructed in the data space [RRSPUKF(D)], whereas in the second technique TSVD is applied on the covariance matrix constructed in the ensemble space [RRSPUKF(E)]. The two methods are applied to a realistic El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) prediction model [Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory model, version 5 (LDEO5)] to assimilate the sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies. The results show that both the methods are more computationally efficient than the full-rank SPUKF, in spite of losing some estimation accuracy. When the truncation reaches a trade-off between cost expense and estimation accuracy, both methods are able to analyze the phase and intensity of all major ENSO events from 1971 to 2001 with comparable estimation accuracy. Furthermore, the RRSPUKF is compared against ensemble square root filter (EnSRF), showing that the overall analysis skill of RRSPUKF and EnSRF are comparable to each other, but the former is more robust than the latter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologySame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207