Structural Characterization of the ADAM 16 Disintegrin Loop Active Site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ADAM's have various roles in intercellular adhesion and are thought to function by binding integrins through a 13 amino acid motif called the disintegrin loop. Xenopus laevis sperm express the protein ADAM 16, and peptides with the sequence of its disintegrin loop cause downstream events in eggs that require a rise in intracellular calcium similar to that occurring at fertilization. We characterized the portion of the ADAM 16 disintegrin loop responsible for causing egg activation. A peptide based on the C-terminal half of the motif, which includes a known integrin-binding sequence, is a partial agonist of calcium release. A peptide with the N-terminal sequence of the motif activates eggs in a manner virtually identical to the full-length peptide but lacks a recognized integrin-binding sequence. None of these peptides alter the permeability or fluidity of liposomes made from membrane lipids of X. laevis eggs. This result reflects the fact that the peptides do not cause calcium to leak across the egg membrane and indirectly provides evidence that they act through a receptor on the egg surface. The infrared spectrum of the full-length peptide has a strong absorption peak corresponding to a beta-turn. We predict this structure occurs at the N-terminal sequence MPKT. A rearranged peptide lacking any turns fails to activate eggs. These results provide the first structural information about the active site of an ADAM disintegrin loop. We interpret these results in terms of active site sequences from other ADAM's and the role of integrins during fertilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".