MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cerebral small vessel disease in aging and <scp>A</scp>lzheimer's disease: a comparative study using <scp>MRI</scp> and <scp>SPECT</scp>

2012· article· en· W2090068727 on OpenAlex
Ilia Makedonov, Sandra E. Black, Bradley J. MacIntosh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neurology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreHeart and Stroke FoundationUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
KeywordsPerfusionMedicineWhite matterHyperintensityMagnetic resonance imagingVoxelNuclear medicineLesionSingle-photon emission computed tomographyPerfusion scanningCerebral perfusion pressureCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are associated with aging and are prevalent in various brain pathologies. The purpose of the current study was to characterize WMH perfusion in age-matched elderly controls (ECs) and patients with Alzheimer's disease (ADs). METHODS: Fifty ECs (23 men) and 61 ADs (33 men) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 99mTc-ECD single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cognitive testing. Brain tissue type was classified on T1 weighted images, and WMH were identified on interleaved proton density/T2 weighted images. Co-registered MR images were used to characterize SPECT perfusion patterns. RESULTS: WMH perfusion was lower than normal appearing white matter (NAWM) perfusion (P < 0.001) in both EC and AD groups. There was no WMH perfusion difference between groups when considering the mean perfusion from all WMH voxels (P > 0.43). However, locations that were likely to be considered WMH tended to have lower perfusion in ADs compared with ECs. Perfusion gradients along watershed white matter regions were significantly different between EC and AD groups (P < 0.05). A relationship was found between the volume of a WMH lesion and its mean perfusion (P < 0.001) in both ECs and ADs. CONCLUSION: Global WMH were hypoperfused compared with NAWM to the same degree in EC and AD participants, which suggests a common WMH etiology between groups. However, white matter locations that were likely to contain WMH tended to be hypoperfused in ADs compared with healthy aging. This finding is suggestive of AD-specific pathology that reduces the perfusion at anatomic locations susceptible to the formation of WMH through either the neurodegenerative process or AD-related vasculopathy or both.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it