Le recueil comme condition, ou déclaration, de littéralité : Paul Valéry et Robert Musil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interrogeant le principe d'une " poétique du recueil ", l'article considère, parmi trois cas de figure, le cas où le recueil apporte une qualité littéraire (poétique) à des textes qui n'en auraient pas nécessairement au préalable. Après l'esquisse d'une typologie des différentes formes de recueil, les recueils d'essais de Robert Musil (Nachlass zu Lebzeiten, 1936) et de Paul Valéry (Variété, 1924) sont analysés. L'étude des paratextes est rapportée à la structure des œuvres, montrant que leur projet poétique est fondé sur l'élaboration du recueil : aménagement d'une progression signifiante, mais aussi rappel de la démarche éditoriale elle-même. Ils offrent ainsi l'exemple d'œuvres polytextuelles pour lesquelles la mise en recueil a été non seulement le moyen, mais le geste d'une stratégie d'intégration au champ littéraire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".