Analysis of Load Transmission in Intact and ACL-Deficient Knee Joints Under Drawer at Different Flexion Angles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adequate understanding of functional biomechanics of human knee joints is critical in assessment and improvement of current prevention, evaluation and treatment procedures of the joint disorders and injuries. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) normal function, injury, diagnostic and replacement have remained controversial despite the very high incidence of ACL rupture and replacement as well as considerable research efforts reported in this field. Similar situation holds true with regard to the other components of the joint such as menisci. Our earlier model studies have demonstrated coupling between the ACL and medial meniscus at full extension under horizontal forces suggesting a greater mechanical importance for the medial meniscus following an ACL transection [1]. The current model study, as a continuation of our earlier works [1,2], aimed to investigate the detailed passive response of the fully unconstrained intact and ACL-deficient tibiofemoral joints under up to 100N posterior femoral force at different flexion angles varying from 0° to 90°.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".