Interactions between Dietary Fat Intake and FASN Genetic Variation Influence LDL Peak Particle Diameter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The small, dense LDL phenotype is associated with an increased cardiovascular disease risk. A genome-wide scan performed on the Quebec Family Study (QFS) revealed a quantitative trait locus for LDL peak particle diameter (LDL-PPD) on the 17q21 region. A positional candidate gene - the fatty acid synthase gene (FASN) - encodes a key enzyme in the biogenesis of membrane lipids. FASN may play a role in the regulation of feeding and may be a potential therapeutic target for obesity and insulin resistance. METHODS: Analyses were performed on 592 subjects of the QFS. Dietary fat was estimated by a 3-day food record. LDL-PPD was measured by gradient gel electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gradient gels. RESULTS: Five single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped in FASN gene. FASN rs4246444 was associated with LDL-PPD, but only when fat intake was taken into account (p = 0.001). High and low lipid consumers were defined using a cutoff of 35% of dietary fat intake. Carriers of the variant allele showed smaller LDL-PPD only when consuming a high amount of fat. This association remained significant after adjustments for age, sex, body mass index and plasma triglyceride levels. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that dietary fat intake may modify the effect of the FASN rs4246444 polymorphism on LDL-PPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".