Pretibial Angioplasia: A Novel Entity Encompassing the Clinical Features of Necrobiosis Lipoidica and the Histopathology of Venous Insufficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) presents clinically as waxy yellow-brown plaques, commonly on the shins. Venous insufficiency also involves the legs; however, it has distinct clinical and pathologic features. OBJECTIVE: We present a series of eight patients who had lesions that clinically resembled NL but on pathology showed features resembling venous insufficiency. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2008, eight patients were identified at St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, to have had skin lesions clinically diagnosed as NL, or a similar morphologic entity, but showing histopathologic features resembling venous insufficiency on biopsy. The clinical records and pathology reports of these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The patients' ages ranged from 39 to 73 years. Only one patient was female. Members of the group held diagnoses of diabetes, renal failure, or venous or arterial disease. All patients had lesions on the legs, most on the anterior aspect. The clinical diagnosis was generally NL; other clinical impressions included lichen planus, morphea, and Kaposi sarcoma. All patients had features on pathology resembling venous insufficiency and no features of NL. CONCLUSION: We propose that this unique combination of clinical features of NL and histopathologic features resembling venous insufficiency represents a novel entity for which we propose the name pretibial angioplasia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".