MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090189990 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.184121

High-resolution x-ray scattering studies of structural phase transitions in underdoped<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2007· article· lv· W2090189990 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Zhao, B. D. Gaulin, J. P. Castellan, Jacob P. C. Ruff, S. R. Dunsiger, Genda Gu, H. A. Dabkowska

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2007
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthorhombic crystal systemTetragonal crystal systemPhase diagramCrystallographyPhase (matter)Condensed matter physicsPhase transitionScatteringMaterials sciencePhysicsCrystal structureChemistryOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied structural phase transitions in high quality underdoped ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{x}\mathrm{Cu}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}$ single crystals using high-resolution x-ray scattering techniques. Critical properties associated with the continuous high temperature tetragonal (HTT) $(I4∕mmm)$ to middle temperature orthorhombic (MTO) $(Bmab)$ phase transition were investigated in single crystal samples with $x=0.125$, 0.095, and 0.08, and we find that all behavior is consistent with three-dimensional $XY$ criticality, as expected from theory. Power law behavior in the orthorhombic strain, $2(a\ensuremath{-}b)∕(a+b)$, is observed over a remarkably wide temperature range, spanning most of the MTO regime in the phase diagram. Low temperature measurements investigating the low temperature tetragonal (LTT) $(P{4}_{2}∕ncm)$ phase, below the strongly discontinuous $\mathrm{MTO}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{LTT}$ phase transition, in $x=0.125$ and $x=0.095$ samples show that the LTT phase is characterized by relatively broad Bragg scattering, compared with that observed at related wave vectors in the HTT phase. This shows that the LTT phase is either an admixture of tetragonal and orthorhombic phases or that it is orthorhombic with very small orthorhombic strain, consistent with the ``less orthorhombic'' low temperature structure previously reported in mixed ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x\ensuremath{-}y}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{y}\mathrm{Cu}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}$ single crystals. We compare the complex temperature-composition phase diagram for the location of structural and superconducting phase transitions in underdoped ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{x}\mathrm{Cu}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}$ and find good agreement with results obtained on polycrystalline samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207