Practical Examples for Improved Transmission in Helical Waveguides, Based on One Bending and Two Bendings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an improved approach for the propagation of electromagnetic (EM) fields along a helicalhollow waveguide, based on one bending and two bendings. The objective is to develop a mode model forinfrared (IR) wave propagation, in order to represent the effect of the radius of the cylinder of the helix and thestep’s angle on the output fields and the output power transmission. This model enables us to understand moreprecisely the influence of the step’s angle and the radius of the cylinder of the helix on the output results of eachsection of the helical waveguide, based on one bending and two bendings, for practical cases. The output powertransmission for all bending is improved by increasing the step’s angle or the radius of the cylinder of the helix,especially in the cases of space curved waveguides. This mode model can be a useful tool to improve the outputresults in all the cases of the helical hollow waveguides, based on one bending and two bendings, for industrialand medical regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".