Motion and stability of caisson breakwaters under breaking wave impact
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The possible motions of caisson breakwaters under dynamic load excitation include vibrating motion, vibratingsliding motion, and vibratingrocking motion. Three models are presented in this paper and are used to simulate the histories of vibratingslidingrocking motions of caissons under breaking wave impact. The effect of the dynamic characteristics of the caissonfoundation system and the motions on the displacement, rotation, sliding force, and overturning moment of caissons are investigated. It is shown that the sliding force of the caisson is different from the breaking wave force directly acting on the caisson due to the motion of the caisson and the sliding motion or rocking motion of the caisson can limit the sliding force or overturning moment of the caisson to a certain value. The sliding force never exceeds the friction force between the caisson and the foundation, and the overturning moment never exceeds the stability moment of the caisson. It is concluded that the wave conditions, the dynamic characteristics, and the motions of the caissonfoundation system should be considered in design.Key words: caisson breakwater, breaking wave, vibrating, sliding, rocking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".