Two phased cellular PSO: A new collaborative cellular algorithm for optimization in dynamic environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many real world optimization problems are dynamic in which the fitness landscape is time dependent and the optima change over time such as dynamic economic modeling, dynamic resource scheduling, and dynamic vehicle routing. Such problems challenge traditional optimization methods as well as conventional evolutionary optimization algorithms. For such environments, optimization algorithms not only have to find the global optimum but also closely track its trajectory. In this paper, we propose a collaborative version of cellular PSO, named Two Phased cellular PSO to address dynamic optimization problems. The proposed algorithm introduces two search phases in order to create a more efficient balance between exploration and exploitation in cellular PSO. The conventional PSO in cellular PSO is replaced by a proposed PSO to increase the exploration capability and an exploitation phase is added to increase exploitation is the promising cells. Moreover, the cell capacity threshold which is a key parameter of cellular PSO is eliminated due to these modifications. To demonstrate the performance and robustness of the proposed algorithm, it is evaluated in various dynamic environment modeled by Moving Peaks Benchmark. The results show that for all the experimented dynamic environments, TP-CPSO outperforms all compared algorithms including cellular PSO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it