MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090223860 · doi:10.1109/ims3tw.2008.4581629

Simultaneous optical and fluorescent microscopic measurement of drug retention in single cancer cells

2008· article· en· W2090223860 on OpenAlexaff
Yuchun Chen, Paul C. H. Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorescenceCancer cellCell countingMaterials scienceFluorescence microscopeChemistryCellMultiple drug resistanceSingle-cell analysisBiophysicsMicrofluidicsCancerNanotechnologyCell cycleOpticsBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single cancer cell was isolated and captured by a microfluidic single-cell biochip. The chip was made of glass and was fabricated by standard photolithography and wet etch process. Simultaneous optical observation and fluorescent measurement were achieved on the captured cancer cell. This was achieved by using red light to observe the cell; whereas the green fluorescent emission was measured photometrically to monitor the drug concentration. A CCD camera was used to image the cell morphology. At the same time, a PMT detector was used to monitor the cellular drug concentrations change in the single cell as a decrease in the cellular fluorescence intensity. Kinetic information of drug concentration change was obtained by analyzing the real time PMT data. This experiment revealed that during the efflux process, the anti-cancer drug (daunorubicin, DNR) decreased as the drug was pumped out of the cell because of multidrug resistance. The reversal effect of a multidrug resistance inhibitor (Sodium orthovanadate, OVN) on the cellular drug retention in single cancer cells was examined in this study. It was found that a higher cellular DNR concentration was resulted when OVN was present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207