Le cinéma québécois et la question identitaire. La confrontation entre les récits de l’empêchement et de l’enchantement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose un cheminement interprétatif de l’expression de la question identitaire dans les films québécois récents, en montrant comment l’identité est mobilisée par les cinéastes. Deux récits structurent de façon fondamentale l’imaginaire filmique québécois : un récit hégémonique du manque, du vide, récit tragique de l’empêchement d’être, et un récit de la pluralité, de l’ambivalence assumée positivement, récit de l’enchantement d’être. L’originalité et la richesse du cinéma québécois résident justement dans la tension entre les deux récits qui parcourt cette cinématographie, des premiers films aux plus récentes productions. Nous serons ainsi en mesure de proposer quelques éléments de réflexion concernant les liens qui s’établissent, au Québec, entre l’identité, le politique et les références temporelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".