MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090250011 · doi:10.7202/009233ar

Le cinéma québécois et la question identitaire. La confrontation entre les récits de l’empêchement et de l’enchantement

2004· article· fr· W2090250011 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Christian Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose un cheminement interprétatif de l’expression de la question identitaire dans les films québécois récents, en montrant comment l’identité est mobilisée par les cinéastes. Deux récits structurent de façon fondamentale l’imaginaire filmique québécois : un récit hégémonique du manque, du vide, récit tragique de l’empêchement d’être, et un récit de la pluralité, de l’ambivalence assumée positivement, récit de l’enchantement d’être. L’originalité et la richesse du cinéma québécois résident justement dans la tension entre les deux récits qui parcourt cette cinématographie, des premiers films aux plus récentes productions. Nous serons ainsi en mesure de proposer quelques éléments de réflexion concernant les liens qui s’établissent, au Québec, entre l’identité, le politique et les références temporelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207