Limit equilibrium slope stability analysis using the nonlinear strength failure criterion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The limit equilibrium stability analysis of two- and three-dimensional slopes with the nonlinear failure strength criterion uses a number of variables to determine the normal and shear stress on the slip surface. The equation for the nonlinear strength failure criterion is expressed using a Taylor series after analyzing the stress of an elemental slice or column. Multivariate linear equations are then derived to determine these variables based on the force and moment equilibrium conditions the sliding body is subject to. The stress on the slip surface can also be obtained to calculate the slope safety factor. The validity of the current method was verified by comparing it with established examples. Charts were produced for slope stability analysis with the nonlinear strength failure criterion under general conditions using the current method. The results of this study show that the slope safety factor decreases with an increase in the geotechnical material parameter m in the nonlinear strength failure criterion. The results of the current method are in close correspondence with other traditional limit equilibrium methods and are more reliable than the Swedish method. The charts can be used to determine slope design parameters that meet specific requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it