MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090263871 · doi:10.1063/1.1315356

Predictions of rotation–vibration effects in time-resolved photoelectron angular distributions

2000· article· en· W2090263871 on OpenAlexafffund
Stuart C. Althorpe, Tamar Seideman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRotation (mathematics)Diatomic moleculeCoupling (piping)AsymmetryVibrationAtomic physicsIonizationPhysicsPolyatomic ionMoleculeIonMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the physical origin of direct reflection of rotation–vibration coupling in time-resolved photoelectron angular distributions. The theory is developed for a general rotation–vibration coupling mechanism in a polyatomic system and applied to the simplest instance of such interaction, namely centrifugal coupling in a diatomic molecule. Our results suggest the possibility of determining coupling strengths from the observed time dependence of the ionization asymmetry parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207