MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090273175 · doi:10.1002/app.1945

UV photopolymerization behavior of dimethacrylate oligomers with camphorquinone/amine initiator system

2001· article· en· W2090273175 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotopolymerization techniques and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerizationPhotopolymerPhotoinitiatorPolymer chemistryDifferential scanning calorimetryCuring (chemistry)Materials scienceRadical polymerizationBulk polymerizationElastomerChemistryPolymerComposite materialMonomer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ultraviolet (UV)‐initiated polymerization of dimethacrylate oligomers with camphorquinone (CQ) and a tertiary amine as a radical photoinitiator system was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. Polymerization behavior of two curing systems, one glass‐forming and the other elastomer‐forming, were compared, based on the rate of polymerization and the double bond conversion. The radical termination in the glass‐forming system (E‐bis‐A DMA‐1) became diffusion controlled immediately upon exposure to UV radiation, with the reaction rate quickly reaching its maximum. The elastomer‐forming system (E‐bis‐A DMA‐2) polymerized at a much lower rate than E‐bis‐A DMA‐1 because of its lower methacrylate group content. The two systems introduced a different temperature dependence on the rate of polymerization. Increasing the temperature reduced the viscosity and enhanced chain segmental mobility. This delayed the autoacceleration in the glass‐forming system. Polymerization rates for both the curing systems increased with initiator concentration, but the dependence on CQ was only characterized by an exponential factor of <0.5. Presumably, this was due to primary radical recombination. The vinyl group conversion and gel fraction of E‐bis‐A DMA‐1 increased with the increase in CQ concentration and/or curing temperature, while the extent of reaction for E‐bis‐A DMA‐2 was relatively insensitive to the latter two factors. A large number of radicals were trapped inside the network of E‐bis‐A DMA‐1 after photocuring and they decayed slowly. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 1107–1117, 2001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it