ACQUISITION OF INORGANIC CARBON BY THE MARINE HAPTOPHYTE <i>ISOCHRYSIS GALBANA</i> (PRYMNESIOPHYCEAE)<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inorganic carbon acquisition has been investigated in the marine haptophyte Isochrysis galbana. External carbonic anhydrase (CA) was present in air‐grown (0.034% CO2) cells but completely repressed in high (3%) CO2‐grown cells. External CA was not inhibited by 1.0 mM acetazolamide. The capacity of cells to take up bicarbonate was examined by comparing the rate of photosynthetic O2 evolution with the calculated rate of spontaneous CO2 supply; at pH 8.2 the rates of O2 evolution exceeded the CO2 supply rate 14‐fold, indicating that this alga was able to take up HCO3−. Monitoring CO2 concentrations by mass spectrometry showed that suspensions of high CO2‐grown cells caused a rapid drop in the extracellular CO2 in the light and addition of bovine CA raised the CO2 concentration by restoring the HCO3−‐CO2 equilibrium, indicating that cells were maintaining the CO2 in the medium below its equilibrium value during photosynthesis. A rapid increase in extracellular CO2 concentration occurred on darkening the cells, indicating that the cells had accumulated an internal pool of unfixed inorganic carbon. Active CO2 uptake was blocked by the photosynthetic electron transport inhibitor 3‐(3′,4′‐dichlorphenyl)‐1,1‐dimethylurea, indicating that CO2 transport was supported by photosynthetic reactions. These results demonstrate that this species has the capacity to take up HCO3− and CO2 actively as sources of substrate for photosynthesis and that inorganic carbon transport is not repressed by growth on high CO2, although external CA expression is regulated by CO2 concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".