Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des changements importants ont eu lieu dès l’époque moderne dans le domaine de l’histoire, soit en termes d’objet, soit en termes de méthode, soit encore dans les enjeux de la référence au passé. Si la Révolution a momentanément entravé les études historiques en bouleversant l’érudition, elle a suscité aussi un intérêt nouveau pour l’histoire, étroitement articulée sur l’expérience politique, et posé les bases du magistère historique de la génération suivante. Les ambitions de l’histoire en révolution ont été grandioses : ses cadres se sont élargis, ses concepts et ses branches se sont multipliés, elle a été chargée de nouvelles fonctions sociales. Ses réalisations ont fait plus de place aux traditions de pensée et d’écriture, à la continuité des hommes et des écoles. La Révolution a surtout institué l’histoire à travers la centralisation des archives publiques, la mise en place du système d’instruction publique, la fondation de l’Institut
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".