MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090329532 · doi:10.2118/0309-0077-jpt

Electrical Downhole Heaters for Faja Heavy-Oil Reservoirs

2009· article· en· W2090329532 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Bybee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteam injectionEnvironmental scienceOil productionOil sandsOil viscosityFossil fuelOil reservesHigh pressureProduction rateGeologyPetroleumViscosityWaste managementEngineeringMaterials scienceProcess engineeringArchaeologyEngineering physicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper SPE 117682, "Feasibility of Using Electrical Downhole Heaters in Faja Heavy-Oil Reservoirs," by Raul Rodriguez, SPE, Jose Luis Bashbush, SPE, and Adafel Rincon, SPE, Schlumberger, originally prepared for the 2008 SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 20-23 October. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The full-length paper examines use of downhole heaters in thick sands stimulating vertical and horizontal wells, evaluates temporary application of downhole heaters in horizontal wells for a limited period of time, and covers basic economic analyses. Introduction The Orinoco belt (Faja) in Venezuela contains one of the largest resources in the world of heavy and extraheavy oil. Because of the production decline of conventional light crude, projects must focus on increasing the recovery of heavy and extraheavy oils by use of thermal and nonthermal methods. Steam-based thermal-recovery processes are more efficient in low-pressure reservoirs; however, because of their depth, the initial pressures of the reservoirs in the Faja are relatively high, ranging from 600 to 1,500 psi with viscosities typically greater than 2,000 cp. For these reasons, it is important to decrease the pressure of the reservoirs with primary-production techniques to facilitate the economical implementation of steam-injection-based methods. The initial production of heavy and viscous oils can be accelerated by use of downhole heaters that, by providing energy to the vicinity of the well, decrease oil viscosity and increase the oil-production rate. A consequential advantage of using downhole heaters as a prelude to a steam-injection process is that they accelerate early production and reservoir-pressure depletion. Electrical Downhole Heaters. Electrical heating consists of providing electrical currents to generate heat and increase the temperature near the wellbore. There are two kinds of downhole heaters in use by the oil industry: inductive heaters, generating heat in accordance with Maxwell's law, and resistive heaters that generate heat in accordance with the Joule effect. In the latter case, the heat transfer is by conduction and it requires an extended time period to heat the reservoir. In this study, the resistive heater is modeled with the aid of a numerical thermal simulator. This type of heating process stimulates oil recovery primarily by reducing the oil viscosity in the near-wellbore region and secondly by thermal expansion of reservoir fluids. The key parameters to be understood in this process are the heavy-oil-viscosity variation with temperature and the rate of heat provided by the heater associated with the generated temperature gradient in the volume around the well. Heat output from resistive heaters typically ranges from 14 to 730 W/ft (1,100 to 60,000 Btu/D/ft). A maximum-exposure temperature normally is imposed on the heaters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207