MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090330525 · doi:10.4161/cc.21886

Level of cdk5 expression predicts the survival of relapsed multiple myeloma patients

2012· letter· en· W2090330525 on OpenAlexafffund
Zachary Levacque, Jesusa L. Rosales, Ki‐Young Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsAlberta Cancer FoundationUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyMultiple myelomaCancer researchOverall survivalCell survivalImmunologyOncologyApoptosisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (cdk5) is a small serine/threonine kinase that was identified based on its structural similarity to cdk1 and cdk2, key regulators of mammalian cell cycle progression.1 However, cdk5 is unique in that it is activated by the non-conventional cyclin, p35 or p39, which are abundant in postmitotic neurons.1 Indeed, cdk5 activity has been associated with neuronal functions, such as differentiation, migration and synaptic plasticity.1 However, there is increasing evidence suggesting that cdk5 activity is also present in non-neuronal cells and is involved in diverse functions, including DNA repair and cell cycle progression.2 Cdk5 mediates DNA repair through phosphorylation and activation of ATM,3 which is critical for double strand break repair by homologous recombination.4 In addition, silencing cdk5 sensitizes breast cancer cells to PARP inhibitors, which are highly effective against cells that are deficient in DNA double-strand break repair.2 Since no difference in PARP inhibitor sensitivity was observed when either ATM alone or both ATM and cdk5 are silenced, it appears that cdk5 and ATM operate in the same pathway.2 Interestingly, cdk5 has been shown to be required for intra-S and G2/M cell cycle checkpoints.2 Furthermore, evidence for a link between cdk5 and cancer is increasing. Cdk5 has been shown to positively regulate migration and metastasis in prostate cancer cells.5 Additionally, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter region of the cdk5 gene have been linked to increased risk for lung cancer.6 Decreased methylation of the cdk5 promoter region, which resulted in increased cdk5 expression, was also observed in mantle cell lymphoma.7 To further investigate the link between the level of cdk5 expression and human cancers, we initially examined multiple microarray data sets (Oncomine) that measured levels of cdk5 in cancer vs corresponding normal tissues. Out of a total of 308 independent analyses of 137 microarray data sets, consisting of a total of 12,902 patients, we found that 146 analyses revealed significant upregulation of cdk5, and 41 analyses showed significant downregulation of cdk5 (Fig. 1A). Among those that showed significant upregulation of cdk5 expression are colorectal, head/neck, breast, lung, ovarian, lymphoma, prostatic, sarcoma, myeloma and bladder cancers. Conversely, brain and esophageal cancers and leukemia have significantly lower cdk5 expression. It is important to note that although 11 of the 24 analyses of brain cancer showed reduction of cdk5 levels compared with normal brain, analyses may have been compromised by comparing different cell populations, i.e., neurons that highly express cdk5 with dedifferentiated astrocytic tumor cells that express considerably lower levels of cdk5. Recently, silencing cdk5 has also been demonstrated to sensitize multiple myeloma cells to treatment with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor that generates considerable clinical response in newly diagnosed as well as advanced multiple myeloma patients.8 However, only 40% of patients respond to bortezomib, and most of these patients develop resistance over time. As cdk5 expression is upregulated in multiple myeloma, and cdk5 mediates bortezomib sensitivity, we investigated the possibility that cdk5 could serve as a predictive marker for patient survival following bortezomib treatment. Using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, we determined that, following bortezomib treatment, patients with high cdk5 expression (top quartile) have significantly lower survival compared with patients with low cdk5 expression (bottom quartile) (Fig. 1B). After 750 to 1,000 d of bortezomib treatment, survival of patients with low cdk5 expression is about 50%, while that of patients with high cdk5 expression is only about 15%. No significant difference in survival was observed between high and low cdk5-expressing cancer patients treated with dexamethasone, indicating specificity to bortezomib (data not shown). In vitro, the cdk5 inhibitors roscovitine and SCH727965 have been shown to sensitize primary myeloma cells to bortezomib treatment.8 Whether this will translate to a clinical setting remains to be determined. While the precise mechanism of bortezomib action in multiple myeloma is still unknown, it has been shown that bortezomib reduces NFκB activity and induces unfolded protein response, ER stress and immune sensitization.9 Bortezomib also inhibits the transcription of many DNA repair enzymes, including those involved in non-homologous end joining, mismatch repair, base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair.10 As cdk5 acts on the G2/M checkpoint to prevent passage into mitosis upon DNA damage,2 lack of cdk5 allows unregulated mitotic entry that increases genomic instability and, thus, apoptosis. In multiple myeloma, it is conceivable that the combination of DNA repair deficiencies related to bortezomib treatment and lack of cdk5 causes significant strain on DNA repair pathways leading to synthetic lethality. Regardless of the mechanism involved in the synergism between bortezomib treatment and lack of cdk5, it is clear from our analyses that cdk5 is generally upregulated in human cancers, and at least in multiple myeloma, patients with low cdk5 levels have significantly higher overall survival following bortezomib treatment. Thus, cdk5 could serve as a valuable prognostic marker and may allow the identification of multiple myeloma patients that will likely respond to bortezomib treatment. Figure 1. (A) Up- and downregulation of cdk5 expression in human cancers. Analysis of cdk5 expression in cancer vs corresponding normal tissues was performed using the Oncomine microarray online data mining software with threshold p value < ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207