MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090331763 · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.876251

Constructions of quadratic bent functions in polynomial forms

2006· article· en· W2090331763 on OpenAlexaff
Nam Yul Yu, Guang Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBent molecular geometryCombinatoricsMathematicsBent functionBoolean functionPolynomialQuadratic equationDegree (music)Discrete mathematicsSigmaGeometryPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this correspondence, the constructions and enumerations of all bent functions represented by a polynomial form of f(x)=/spl Sigma//sub i=1//sup n/2-1/c/sub i/Tr(x/sup 1+2(i)/)+c/sub n/2/Tr/sub 1//sup n/ /sup /2/(x/sup 1+2(n/2)/), c/sub i//spl isin//sub 2/ F/sub 2/ are presented for special cases of n. Using an iterative approach, the construction of bent functions of n variables with degree n/2 is also provided using the constructed quadratic bent functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207