MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090358066 · doi:10.4021/wjon512w

Hypercalcemia as a Presenting Clinical Manifestation of Adenocarcinoma of the Colon

2012· article· en· W2090358066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Argento

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMalignancyColorectal cancerInternal medicineAbdominal painNauseaGastroenterologyOncologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypercalcemia is rarely associated with colon cancer. It is related to overexpression of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rp) in malignant cells of the primary colon tumor and metastases. A 44 year old lady presented for evaluation of severe hypercalcemia (15.7 mg/dL) associated with abdominal pain, nausea and constipation. She was diagnosed with metastatic colon cancer involving the liver. Therapy for hypercalcemia consisted of intravenous bisphosphonate and saline hydration. Hypercalcemia remained resistant and refractory to treatment despite resection of the colon tumor. She died soon after admission to hospice. It is proposed that malignant cells of the primary colon tumor and distant metastases, in this patient, were the site of ectopic PTH-rp secretion resulting in hypercalcemia. This case illustrates the significance of recognizing hypercalcemia as a potential clue in detecting underlying colon cancer involving overproduction of PTH-rp. It also exemplifies the poor prognosis expected with this type of humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy and the difficulty encountered when trying to achieve normalization of calcium in this setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207